Submit a post
Go to Blog

2016 Election: Search and Social Media Analysis

The Wow-Score shows how engaging a blog post is. It is calculated based on the correlation between users’ active reading time, their scrolling speed and the article’s length.
Learn more

2016 Election: Search and Social Media Analysis

Luke Harsel
2016 Election: Search and Social Media Analysis

With the election season in full swing, it's safe to say that most people hear Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump's name mentioned on a regular basis. 

We were curious about how the two presidential candidates position themselves online with SEO, PPC and Social Media so we decided to take a closer look using data from SEMrush and Google Trends.

We gathered a lot of different data from SEMrush Domain Analytics and the SEMrush Project tools, so feel free to use the table of contents to jump around different sections of this post. 

Please note: This is not an endorsement of indictment of either presidential candidate. The research was conducted with the intention of highlighting the SEMrush database and features.

Table of Contents:

Organic Positions (SEO)
Domain vs Domain Tool
Health Care Keywords
Immigration Keywords
Phrase Match Keywords
Adwords Spending (PPC)
Site Audit
Backlink Audit
Google Trends
Social Media
Top Posts 10/11 - 10/23
Top Posts 10/4 - 10/11
Top Posts 9/28 - 10/4
Top Posts 9/20 - 9/28

Organic Positions (SEO)

When “hillary clinton” or “donald trump” is searched on Google, the Knowledge Graph provides additional information to the right about each candidate. One of these features is a list of issues with quotes from each candidate’s stance. 


Included in the list are the following topics:

  • Immigration

  • Guns

  • Abortion

  • Foreign policy

  • Taxes

  • Gay marriage

  • Health care

  • Economy and jobs

  • Civil Liberties

  • Crime and safety

  • Environment

  • Education

  • Budget and spending

  • National security

  • Medicare and Social Security

  • Veterans

  • Energy

Considering these 16 topics are promoted by Google as a part of their Knowledge Graph, one can assume that these are considered by Google to be the most relevant issues facing searchers interested in the two presidential candidates.

To see just how well each candidate’s website is optimized to target the issues above, we ran Organic Positions reports on the two websites and applied keyword filters for each topic. This way, we could find the number of times the websites ranked for (in Google’s top 100 results) a keyword that included the name of the issue in the search phrase. We collected data this way on September 20th and October 21st. Below is a table comparing the difference in each candidate's’ number of positions over the course of the month:

Immigration was the most popular topic, with Trump’s site ranking for 1,240 keywords that include the word “immigration,” and Clinton’s site ranking for 842 keywords that include "immigration" in September.

Clinton’s site saw a huge jump in the amount of “immigration” keywords over the past month, ending up with 1,194 positions by October 21st. Meanwhile, Trump’s site saw a large decrease in the amount of “immigration” keywords at the same time, with 1,079 positions by the 21st.

The second most popular topic was Health Care, with Trump’s site initially ranking for 560 "health care" keywords and Clinton’s site rankings for 792. Both sites increased their number of positions for health care keywords.

The other topics where one candidate had a significantly higher number of positions than the other were Foreign Policy, Gay Marriage, Education, Medicare and Social Security, and Veterans.

In total, Trump’s website lost 99 ranking positions for these topical searches over the past month, while Clinton’s website gained 652.

These changes in position could be the result of anything from new content, to new backlinks, to a change in click through rates on their search results.

Domain vs Domain Tool

To look at some of the specific search terms that the two sites compete for, we ran the Domain vs. Domain tool. This tool allows you to compare the rankings between two domains that share common keywords. We entered and, applying filters for keywords that contained “health care” and “immigration.”

This tool can gather keywords where the sites rank anywhere in Google's top 100 results, but we applied an additional filter to only look at the keywords where both were ranking in the top 20 results. Each website’s position is listed in the column below their domain name.

Health Care Keywords

“Health care plan” and “health care proposals” were the most competitive keywords in this batch, with both sites currently ranking on the first page. For “health care proposals,” Donald Trump’s website holds the first position and Hillary Clinton’s site holds the second position.

Immigration Keywords


In this set of keywords, there's more search volume and closer competition. Searches for “immigration reform,” “immigration website,” “immigration bill,” “immigration policies,” “immigration reforms,” and “reform immigration” all saw and ranking on the first page. At the time, Hillary Clinton’s website ranked in the first position for “immigration reform” and “reform immigration.”

For the complete list of common keywords between the two domains, view this unfiltered domain vs. domain report

Phrase Match Keywords

Another easy way to look at how people search for information about competitors is by using the Phrase Match report. Enter a word or phrase into the search bar and this report will provide a list of extended search phrases that include the queried word and a modifier.

We ran these reports with “hillary clinton” and “donald trump” as the keywords to see the most popular modifiers used when people search their names. In the reports we saw a number of common modifiers the two candidates shared. Take a look below:



Green indicates who had more searches for each modifier. For example, more people were curious about Hillary Clinton’s age than Donald Trump’s, and more people searched for Donald Trump quotes than Hillary Clinton quotes.

Below is another look at the data, showing the distribution of searches across the common modifiers.



From these graphs, it’s easy to see which modifiers create the most interest towards each candidate. Not surprisingly, “email” was Clinton’s top modifier (reflecting people’s interest in the deleted emails scandal), and “twitter” was the top modifier for Trump (reflecting the interest he creates with his activity on Twitter).

Adwords Spending (PPC)

Using SEMrush Advertising Research reports, you can find out what keywordsa domain is bidding on to place PPC ads through Google AdWords.These reports cover the top 11 AdWords placements for every keyword in the SEMrush database. We ran these reports on both candidates' websites to look closer at their PPC campaign strategy.'s PPC Keywords

As of October 2016, Hillary Clinton's website was found bidding on 806 desktop keywords and 992 mobile keywords. Some of the notable keywords that we saw bidding on were:

  • "queen hillary" 
  • "saint hillary" 
  • "was bill clinton adopted" 
  • "is hillary clinton married" 
  • "i feel you pain bill clinton"
  • "village of clinton" 
  • "bill clinton religion" 
  • "cgi clinton" 
  • "bill clinton for president"
  • "hillary t shirts" 
  • "i love hillary" 
  • "hilery" 
  • "chelsea clinton for president" 
  • "i love hillary clinton" 
  • "hillary clinton tumblr" 
  • "hillary clinton beautiful" 

And the top 3 most expensive keywords we saw the domain bidding on were:

  • "clinton administration" ($33.80 cost-per-click)
  • "birthdate of hillary clinton" ($25.95 cost-per-click)
  • "hillary clinton satanist" ($15.18 cost-per-click)'s PPC Keywords

As of October 2016, Donald Trump's website was found bidding on 99 desktop keywords and 370 mobile keywords. Some of the notable search terms we found's PPC campaign bidding on were:

  • "donald trump hairstyle" 
  • "clinton foundation twitter" 
  • "donald trump ex wives"
  • "donald trump wigs" 
  • "donald trump bobblehead" 
  • "is donald trump a jew" 
  • "hillary t shirts"
  • "donald trump french cuff dress shirts"
  • "who is ivanka trump" 
  • "is donald trump a democrat" 
  • "trump university website" 
  • "who won the debate tonight" 

And Donald Trump's three most expensive keywords bid on were:

  • "donald trump golfing" ($8.35 cost-per-click)
  • "hillary clinton comments" ($5.25 cost-per-click)
  • "ivanka trump website" ($4.11 cost-per-click)

Site Audit

To see the overall health of the two candidates' websites, we ran a Site Audit on both domains. The Site Audit is part of an SEMrush Project that runs a crawl of a website and provides you with a Total Score of the website's health. With every audit, you receive a list of potential issues that could harm the domain’s overall SEO health.

This tool simulates the way Google crawls a website to index content, and it can crawl up to 20,000 pages on a single domain

After running a Site Audit on and, we found their websites' total number of pages and the number of pages with SEO-related issues.


The Site Audit crawled and found 2,690 out of 3,067 pages on the site had issues, giving the website a Total Score of 50%. According to the audit,’s top health issue was having 2,802 broken internal links.


Site Audit crawled and found 6,106 out of 6,637 pages on the site had issues, with a Total Score of 55%.According to the audit,’s top issue was having 6,267 images without alt attributes.

Backlink Audit

Backlink Audit, another tool in SEMrush' Projects section, checks a domain’s backlink profile for any potentially toxic signals that could result in a Google penalty. Toxic signals the Backlink Audit checks for include spam links, link networks, weak domains, and manipulative links, among others.

We ran a Backlink Audit on each candidate’s website to compare the health of their respective backlinks.


The Backlink Audit of Donald Trump’s website discovered 370 toxic links and 3,559 potentially toxic links out of a total of 25,711 backlinks. Due to the level of toxicity among the dangerous links discovered here, the site received a “Medium” overall toxic score.


The Backlink Audit of Hillary Clinton’s website discovered 747 toxic links and 4,919 potentially toxic links out of a total of 35,842 total backlinks. Due to the level of toxicity among the dangerous links discovered here, the site received a “Low” overall toxic score.

Webmasters will want to remove or disavow any dangerous backlinks to avoid potential penalties and keep a clean backlink profile. 

Google Trends

Using data from Google Trends, we found the dates that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were mentioned the most over the past two months (Donald Trump in red and Hillary Clinton in blue).


For Hillary Clinton, July 29th (accepting the presidential nomination), September 11th (leaving a 9/11 memorial early due to health issues), and September 27th (first presidential debate) were the most popular days for Google searches of her name.

For Donald Trump, July 22nd (accepting the presidential nomination) and September 27th (first presidential debate) were the most popular days that he was searched on Google.

One thing is for sure, whenever something notable happens during the campaign, the public’s reaction will be reflected in search trends and the candidates will respond to the public through social media.

Social Media

To follow the two candidates’ activity on social media, we ran the SEMrush Social Media Tool (another part of an SEMrush Project) on the two presidential candidates’ websites. The Social Media Tool allows you to monitor the audience, activity, and engagement of a company’s profiles on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google Plus Instagram, and LinkedIn. 

Audience Size 

Comparing the social media audiences of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's Facebook and Twitter pages, we can see the difference between the two candidates' audience size. Trump has a total of over 24 million combined followers between the two platforms, and Clinton has a total of almost 17 million.

However, over the past month, we can see that Clinton has outperformed Trump in both Change (2.1 million new followers) and Growth (14.3% increase).

To put the candidate’s amount of followers online in perspective, voter turnout over the past two presidential elections was reported around 130 million votes.

According to, the total social media audience in the United States was 179.9 million users. So, there are currently more social media users in the United States than voters.

According to, the average Facebook user has about 338 friends. If we take this average and multiply it by each candidate’s number of shares over the past 90 days, we can get an estimate of their reach on Facebook.

Donald Trump’s Facebook page had over 10 million shares over the past 90 days., then we can estimate that his posts were projected to a potential of over 3 billion Facebook feeds through shares in the past 3 months.

Hillary Clinton’s Facebook page had about 5 million shares over the past 90 days. then those posts were projected to a potential of about 1.5 billion Facebook feeds through sharing.

Facebook Engagement Trend

Looking at the Engagement trends in the Social Media Tool, we can see where each candidate's social media saw spikes in engagement with their audiences (Donald Trump’s social media is the dark blue line, and Hillary Clinton’s social media is the light blue line).

So far, the most clear spikes in engagement occurred around the timing of the debates. The first Presidential Debate was on 9/26, the Vice Presidential Debate was on 10/4, the second Presidential Debate was on 10/9, and the last Presidential Debate was on 10/19.

The two candidates' engagement levels on Facebook appeared relatively neck and neck for the debates on 9/26 and 10/4, but Donald Trump's Facebook engagement saw a huge spike following the second presidential debate on 10/9 and 10/19. 

Twitter Engagement Trend

Not surprisingly, the same dates saw spikes on Twitter. Notice the light blue line (Clinton) spiked higher after the first Presidential Debate, and the dark blue (Trump) spiked higher after the Vice Presidential Debate,second Presidential Debate, and third Presidential Debate (September 26th, October 4th, 9th, and 19th).

To look even closer, we found the Facebook posts and tweets that brought the pages the most engagement week to week. 

Top Posts 10/11 - 10/23

Facebook Posts:

To summarize the two sides’ most recent posting activity on Facebook, we captured GIFs of Hillary and Trump’s top 10 posts since October 11th found with the Social Media tool (notice the number in the leftmost column listing the posts from 1-10). The posts are listed by Total engagement, which is the sum of reactions, comments and shares on each post.


Below are Trump’s top 10 posts from the same time period:



We also captured GIFs of Hillary and Trump’s top 10 tweets since October 11th from the Social Media tool. See Hillary’s top tweets below:


Hillary’s top tweets were mostly centered around the debates with an optimistic tone, in which she declared herself the winner of three straight debates and even using the hashtag #shewon. In contrast, take a look through Trump’s top 10 tweets from the past two weeks.


Some notable topics tweeted about were Hillary Clinton going to jail and the election being rigged.

Top Posts 10/4 - 10/11

Facebook posts:

Hillary Clinton's most engaging post on Facebook during this week was posted on October 9th (following the debate) and earned over 319,000 reactions, 30,000 comments, and 112,000 shares.


Trump's top Facebook post was posted on the same day and received over 424,000 reactions, 56,000 comments, and 651,000 shares. That's almost six times as many shares than his running mate's top Facebook post.



On Twitter, Hillary Clinton's top tweet went out on October 7th and received over 92,000 likes and 52,000 retweets. 


Meanwhile, Donald Trump's top tweet during this week received over 121,000 likes and 53,000 retweets posted on October 8th. About 30,000 more likes, but a similar number of retweets.

Top Posts 9/28 - 10/4 

Facebook posts:

Hillary Clinton’s most engaging Facebook post the previous week was posted on September 30th and received over 188,000 reactions, 5,000 comments, and 13,000 shares.

Donald Trump’s most engaging Facebook post between 9/28 and 10/4 was on October 4th, receiving over 198,000 reactions, 10,000 comments, and 81,000 shares.

During this week, Donald Trump's top Facebook post received twice as many comments and over five times as many shares as Hillary Clinton's top Facebook post.


Donald Trump’s most engaging tweet between 9/28 and 10/4 was posted on October 4th following the VP debate and received over 120,000 likes and 36,000 retweets.

Hillary Clinton’s most engaging tweet in the same time frame was on September 28th, receiving over 31,000 likes and 21,000 retweets.

Top Posts 9/20 - 9/28

Facebook posts:

Hillary Clinton’s most engaging Facebook post between 9/20 and 9/28 was posted on September 26th, the day after the first debate. The post received over 409,000 reactions, 14,000 comments, and 147,000 shares.

Donald Trump’s most engaging Facebook post between 9/20 and 9/28 was also posted on September 26th. This post received over 189,000 reactions, 12,000 comments, and 56,000 shares.

During this week, we saw a similar number of comments on each candidate's top post, yet Hillary Clinton’s post received nearly three times the number of shares and reactions.


Donald Trump’s most engaging tweet between 9/20 and 9/28 was posted on September 20th and received over 76,000 likes and 31,000 retweets.


Hillary Clinton’s most engaging tweet between 9/20 and 9/28 went out on September 26th, and received over 155,000 likes and 100,000 retweets.

Ending Thoughts

This is certainly a unique election, for many reasons. As voters, being able to watch the two candidates go back and forth on social media in addition the actual debate stage gives us an entire additional perspective on how to assess the presidential hopefuls style of communicating. 

The hundred of thousands of shares and reactions on Facebook and Twitter plus the high volume of searches related to each candidate prove that people are taking the conversation to the Internet. Just how much will Google searches and tweets influence the election? We'll see in a couple of weeks. 

All of the data (except for the Google Trends chart) in this post can be found using SEMrush’s Domain Analytics and Projects tools. With a single SEMrush Project, you can set up a Site Audit, Backlink Audit, Social Media Tool, Position Tracking, Brand Monitoring, and more. Just go here to start a project and read the user manual if you need help.

We're going to update this blog post with more data as the race continues, so if there's anything you think we should add, let us know in the comments! 

Remember, if you ever need assistance on learning how to use any of the features of our software, you can always contact our Customer Success Team at [email protected] or by phone at 1-855-814-4510.

Thank you to SEMrush data scientist Qi Zhao for helping with this post!

Like this post? Follow us on RSS and read more interesting posts:

I write articles on the SEMrush Knowledge Base and blog to show people how the tools on SEMrush can make it easier to participate in digital marketing. When I'm not at work I like to write music and spend time in nature.
Share this post


2000 symbols remain
Hi Luke! I'd like to quote you in BA thesis. Contact me at [email protected]
many thanks for your impressive work
Luke Harsel
chiara cabini
Hi Chiara, just sent you an email! Thanks for your interest.
Hello Luke, I would like to use your article including screenshots in my BA dissertation. Is that ok? Can you please contact me at [email protected]? Thanks
Luke Harsel
Piotr Slonina
Hi Piotr! Just sent you an email.
Thank you for writing this article. Marketers reading this - please track your campaigns for successful optimization down the road. We use Taglynx to create “tagged” links for you to post, email, and put on ads. Check it out:
Tara Clapper
Luke: This is seriously impressive. I'm amused that people keep searching for info on the candidates' hair. The most interesting part was their notable bids, especially Trump going for the election night winner keyword and Hillary going for "Queen Hillary." Ha!
Luke Harsel
Tara Clapper
Thanks Tara! I agree, a lot of their paid keywords were ridiculous. But, I guess people search for them, and when you're running for president you have to cover all of your bases!
Olle Neiman
Very interesting angle on the elections. It's especially amusing that both of their sites have almost 90% pages with errors. :)
Luke Harsel
Olle Neiman
Thanks Olle! And yeah - plenty of room for improvement on both sites.

Send feedback

Your feedback must contain at least 3 words (10 characters).

We will only use this email to respond to you on your feedback. Privacy Policy

Thank you for your feedback!